Ravi JeremyProduct designerLet’s talk
All work

Independent / Community

Indonesia Remote Club.

One community, three connected experiences. A place to find your people, the tools to bring them together, and a little help behind the scenes.

Case study / AI Automation

A helpful assistant behind every gathering.

A proposed automation workflow that turns incoming requests into organised drafts, with people in control of the messages members actually receive.

Role
Service design & automation UX
Timeline
4 weeks · example scope
Scope
Workflow design · Review queue · Recovery states

Illustrative draft Sample story, scope, and concept screens. These are placeholders, not verified project results.

Concept automation canvas connecting an incoming question to approved information, a draft response, and human review, with a separate path for missing context.View full image
01 / A proposed request-to-reply workflow. Human review is part of the flow, not an afterthought.

01 / The challenge

The same questions. A human answer.

In this sample scenario, community hosts repeatedly answer questions about upcoming events, joining a chapter, and updating an RSVP. The information is often straightforward, but the back-and-forth interrupts the work of actually hosting.

The design challenge was to reduce repetitive preparation while preserving a personal, accurate response. An assistant should know when it has enough context to help and when a request belongs with a person.

02 / The approach

Automate the preparation. Keep the judgment human.

The proposed system separates understanding, drafting, and sending, so an uncertain answer never quietly becomes a message to a member.

Start from approved information

Drafts use the chapter’s published event details and a reviewed FAQ. The review panel shows the source alongside the suggested response so a host can check the answer.

Route uncertainty to a person

Missing event information, ambiguous requests, and sensitive issues go to a manual queue. The interface explains what is missing instead of presenting a confident guess.

Make recovery part of the flow

A send failure stays visible with its status and retry history. Duplicate requests are grouped, and approval is required before the proposed workflow sends a reply.

03 / A closer look

Concept AI review queue showing a member question, a suggested reply, its event information source, and edit or approve actions.View full image
02 / The review moment: original request, supporting source, and editable reply. Sample messages only.

04 / The reflection

Less repetition, with room for care.

The deliverable is a workflow concept and review experience, not a connected automation service. A pilot would first run in draft-only mode and track factual accuracy, host edits, and requests correctly escalated to a person.

Another part of Indonesia Remote Club

Website

Making the first hello a little easier.